Dershowitz: No Client List, Only Accuser Affidavits

Alan Dershowitz on the Epstein Case and the Alleged "Client List"

Alan Dershowitz, a prominent legal figure who once represented Jeffrey Epstein during his 2008 guilty plea for soliciting minors for prostitution, has recently spoken about the controversy surrounding the case. In an interview with NewsNation's Chris Cuomo, Dershowitz emphasized that there is no "client list" associated with Epstein's activities, a claim that has sparked significant debate.

Dershowitz clarified that the term "client list" implies that Epstein actively compiled a list of individuals he trafficked women to. However, he pointed out that what exists are redacted FBI affidavits from accusers. These documents contain allegations against Epstein and others but have had the names of those accused blacked out.

"I don't know of any information that they could disclose that they haven't disclosed," Dershowitz stated. He added that while there are several affidavits from accusers, the majority of the names involved have already been made public through various media outlets and books. According to him, if all the information were released, the number of names not yet disclosed would be surprisingly low.

Dershowitz also addressed the possibility of hidden evidence, such as video tapes. He explained that while Epstein did have cameras installed in his home, they were not placed in the bedrooms and did not capture any sexual activity. Additionally, he dismissed claims about Mossad involvement, citing his personal knowledge of Epstein's connections. Dershowitz noted that Epstein had no ties to the Mossad, despite rumors linking his girlfriend’s father, Robert Maxwell, to the organization.

The discussion also touched on the circumstances of Epstein's death. Dershowitz suggested that while it was officially ruled a suicide, there may have been external factors at play. He speculated that jail staff might have contributed to the conditions that led to Epstein's death, though he acknowledged the lack of definitive proof.

When asked why Pam Bondi, then U.S. Attorney General under the Trump administration, hasn’t publicly addressed these issues, Dershowitz expressed his belief that she should do so. He suggested that Bondi could explain the challenges of accessing redacted information and the need to go through the courts to unseal documents. He also encouraged media outlets to advocate for transparency.

Dershowitz reiterated his stance on full disclosure, stating that he would waive all confidentiality and privacy rights to ensure that every detail of the case comes to light. However, he acknowledged the complexity of balancing the need for transparency with the protection of accusers. The courts have imposed restrictions to safeguard victims, making it difficult to release all information without compromising their identities.

Ultimately, Dershowitz emphasized the importance of accountability and transparency in the Epstein case. He believes that while some details may remain confidential, the public deserves to know the truth. His comments highlight the ongoing legal and ethical dilemmas surrounding the case and the broader implications for justice and due process.