Court Ruling Deals Blow to Trump's Anti-DEI Agenda

President Trump's efforts to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) from the nation's educational framework faced additional obstacles this week as a judge overturned the Education Department's guidelines.

States, strongly polarized over the matter, were already grappling with a delayed certification deadline And unclear enforcement methods prior to Federal Judge Landya McCafferty issued her preliminary injunction on Trump’s anti-DEI measures.

Woman escapes prison sentence following deadly hit-and-run incident in Wichita

Fortunately, numerous educational institutions from schools and school districts to colleges and universities delayed action as they awaited developments," stated Liz King, who serves as the senior director for education equity at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. "They recognized and comprehended that the directives they received were flagrantly illegal and illogical.

"And thus, hopefully this provides the reassurance that schools require, indicating they shouldn’t succumb to the pressures of this administration," King concluded.

On February 14, the Department of Education sent a “Dear Colleague” A letter to universities warning them that they might lose their federal funding if they fail to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

A few weeks later, officials from the state education department and K-12 school districts were informed that they must verify their schools did not have any DEI initiatives, otherwise facing potential loss of federal funds.

The Department of Education likewise established a “DEI portal” To enable parents and others to notify programs or efforts they believe contravene Trump’s executive orders.

These initiatives led to legal actions and were halted by three judges on Thursday, with two of them being appointees of President Trump.

Judge Dabney Friedrich, appointed by Trump, deemed the efforts unconstitutional due to vagueness and stated that the letter failed to "differentiate between legal DEI practices and illegal ones."

The Education Department is expected to challenge the ruling further, as backers are urging them to provide more detailed arguments when they do so.

"As part of the appeal, I believe they will likely highlight [...] the specific practices leading to racial discrimination," stated Jonathan Butcher, who serves as the Will Skillman senior research fellow in education policy at the Heritage Foundation.

Butcher also mentioned 'from teacher training sessions to various programs that pressure individuals into declaring themselves as oppressors due to their skin color or for other reasons [...] some form of racial preferential treatment.' He went on to say, ‘To be honest, this is part of the procedure.’

The Hill has contacted the Department of Education for their input.

The ambiguity surrounding DEI initiatives in educational institutions became evident during Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s confirmation hearing when she failed to specify whether courses centered on Black history would be permitted under her administration.

Regarding the "Dear Colleague" letter, the department needed to issue an additional memorandum because several universities were uncertain whether the directive permitted student groups defined by race or ethnicity to continue operating.

At the same time, several liberal states were explicitly declining to verify that their educational institutions were free from Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives.

As stated initially, the Minnesota Department of Education has already offered the necessary commitment indicating their compliance with Title VI and its corresponding regulations. This also encompasses our pledge that we adhere to and will continue adhering to Supreme Court rulings that interpret these provisions. We are submitting this letter as our formal reply to your particular inquiry," Minnesota communicated to the federal authorities.

The Department of Education aims to build upon the 2023 Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action, which stated that universities cannot consider race during admissions. They assert that this ruling extends further than just the student application process.

Regrettably, we've witnessed numerous instances where schools have disregarded or blatantly violated these responsibilities," Craig Trainor, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the Education Department, stated in the K-12 certification letter. "This includes implementing DEI initiatives to unfairly disadvantage certain American groups in favor of others based on their identities, which clearly contravenes Title VI.

Around 10 percent of the funds for K-12 schools come from federal sources, though low-income districts receive somewhat greater support.

In higher education institutions, the Trump administration has demonstrated its willingness to withhold hundreds of millions or possibly billions of dollars in federal funds from colleges accused of civil rights infractions, often without conducting an inquiry first.

One of these institutions is Harvard University, is suing the administration following the announcement of budget reductions after it declined to meet a set of demands from Trump, which included doing away with diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

The following day after the lawsuit was submitted, over 100 college and university heads, including those from Cornell, Tufts, and Princeton, issued a joint letter criticizing Trump’s “political meddling” and “pressured utilization of public research funds.”

However, as certain institutions faced budget cuts, some schools proactively started disassembling parts of their diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Last month, the University of Michigan announced that it would be shutting down its DEI offices.

"I grasp the apprehension [… ] Essentially, they have been extorting organizations using federal money. They have generated intentional disorder through the [executive orders] and ambiguous directives, causing individuals to comply anticipatorily with various measures," stated Andrea Abrams, who serves as the executive director for the Defending American Values Coalition.

"The fears they have are valid, but the reasons for being courageous are equally valid," she said.

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This content must not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or distributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KSN-TV.